Daily Archives: May 22, 2010

Laughing at the Euro?

There’s a lot of rather haughty laughing coming from many sectors of British political society at the moment: not least from a vocal group of little-englanders enjoying the Euro’s current difficulties and praising the hinterland of Sterling for ‘saving’ us from the economic woe caused by a lack of initial control in the Euro and the profligacy of almost all of the southern states.

But wait. Let’s take a look at the facts:

UK Exports – Main sources :

  • European Union 57%
  • United States: 15%
  • Switzerland: 2%
  • China: 2%
  • Japan: 2%
UK imports – Main sources :

  • European Union 55%
  • USA: 9%
  • China: 8%
  • Norway: 5%
  • Japan: 3%

Now, using this as an anchor for our perspective, maybe we could have a little sensible debate: clearly it would be entirely inapproriate for Britain to stump the Euro, even though we’re bound in part by the Lisbon Treaty to do so (and indeed have when Alistair Darling put up £6bn hours after the election result). But we have to be reasonable – we are reliant on trade with our European neighbours, and if they’re in trouble then let’s be under no false pretence, we will be too.

Also, let’s not forget that we’re a veritable speck in the economic ocean compared to the Eurozone, let’s look at the markets, we have a ‘critical’ election that decides how UK government spending is going to change and days of uncertainty as coalitions are forged and it’s barely acknowledged on the international markets. The Eurozone sneezes on the other hand and it’s massive percentage knocks day after day: let there be no question – the Eurozone is taken very seriously, and will continue to be taken so.

Of course, this is a major set-back for the Euro, it’s reputation has been damaged by it’s inability to control the states which make it up, and that’s always been my problem with it: huge economies rubbing shoulders with economies that are barely functioning. Powerhouses of export next to countries that live in the economic past struggling to pay the bills with second-rate tourist attractions. It simply never made sense that Greece, Spain, Portugal, Slovenia and Malta (to name but a few) were rushed into the Eurozone. The checks and balances that should have been in place were swept away in preference of unchecked growth.

What is needed now is a period of reflection and reform: the Euro needs to be reigned in; countries that are incapable of paying their bills need to get out – and serious questions now need to be asked about the way the Euro is set up: should it be the case that the countries in the Eurozone share a common taxation base, common economic policies, and if so – who will set that up, and will anyone but the major northern european states actually be able to cope with that, both economically and socially?

Athens descended into rioting and flames when it was suggested that people work longer and with less public services: but in Germany and Britain, this has been the acknowledged truth for many years – with interruptions from various unions yes, but generally, we all know that in reality if you’re my age now, then you’re likely to be working until you’re well into your 70s, and after that there won’t be a national pension of any worth to fall back on (if there’s even one at all). Should this cause social panic? Indeed has it? Of course not – yes union’s have screamed and thrown their toys out of their prams, but the bulk of the population simply see it as impetus to provide for one’s own future… a plan which I hasten to add many thought shot to pieces by Brown’s audacious private pension raid.

So where next for the Euro? Well despite Cameron’s position with Chancellor Merkel the other day, I think we’re actually heading for a period where Britain will hold a bit more power in Europe: played right Cameron & Clegg now have a mandate to use our vote in Europe to make real change happen, fiscal responsibility, reform of waste, reform of the CAP and other european problems that (believe it or not) don’t just irritate us here in Britain. We’d have support to demand change, we’d have a platform to place them upon, and we’d have the right timing to make change in Europe happen for the first time since before Maastricht, because if past-precedent is anything to go by, the hardline integrationists will use this as an excuse to push through unified tax and fiscal policy whatever the cost – and a quick fix is not what Europe needs right now.

We need Europe, and Europe needs us – we are still the gateway to the english speaking world for many major corporations. So let’s take this opportunity to stand with our partners in Europe and roll back years and years of profligacy, selfish and excessive regard for individual nation’s interests and the rampant need for expansion at all cost. Let’s put ourselves at the centre of Europe and make it work, not just for it’s own sake, but for ours.

Expenses: the monster that just won’t die.

Parliamentry expenses is the monster under the bed that just won’t die: it’s once again rearing it’s ugly head as MPs complain that the new rules regarding expenses are unfair, we’ve heard it all – from MPs complaining they’re being treated like they’re on benefits to one MP bemoaning that it’s going to be unsafe to go home.

What happens on a January night in London? I suppose I will have to take the tube, then a bus and then a long walk home. That is not safe.

Well, that’s just awful – I know what I shall do, I’ll fund the police better, I’ll lock up the criminals, I’ll insist train companies fund proper staffing for their stations and I’ll work with councils to ensure that better late night transport routes are provided between hubs… oh wait, I can’t do that: that’s the job of my MP! If the streets are so unsafe for you, then guess what – they’re unsafe for everyone – so use the powers we invested in you to do something about it?

The level of stupidity and hypocrisy regarding expenses is truly staggering, the new Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority created to ‘solve’ the problem of duck houses, husband’s porn and flipping (or to give it it’s proper name ‘fraud‘) is an unwieldily behemoth. It’s generated a situation where for every transaction invoices are received, authorised and paid by MPs they’re then sent to IPSA where they’re re-checked, approved and reimbursed by IPSA – that’s a ludicrous waste of time. When the Sunlight Centre published their report Disinfecting Parliament last year they made a suggestion which draws on vast amounts of real experience from the private sector – that MPs should be issued with a debit or charge card on which all expenses must be charged: that way you get real time electronic tracking, no spending beyond agreed limits and a massive reduction in paperwork and manpower as the card issuer is already well placed to deliver accounts ready for immediate audit.

Here’s hoping that Cameron & Clegg take another leaf from the private sector and take steps to abolish the IPSA (an organisation which has just advertised for a £80,000+ marketing director at our expense). It’s my opinion that the IPSA is nothing but another wasteful quango creating work for itself and it’s beneficiaries when there’s a better solution available from the private sector… I’ve used company debit and charge cards for years, both for myself and my staff, and I see no good reason why this solution is not good enough for Parliament when it’s used by millions of private companies worldwide.